↓ Skip to main content

The detrimental effects of student-disordered behavior at school: evidence from using the cusp catastrophe

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The detrimental effects of student-disordered behavior at school: evidence from using the cusp catastrophe
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1346232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghadah Alkhadim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,248,690
of 25,164,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,509
of 33,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,690
of 180,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#35
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,164,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.