↓ Skip to main content

“What do they mean?” a systematic review on the interpretation, usage and acceptability of “they”

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“What do they mean?” a systematic review on the interpretation, usage and acceptability of “they”
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mafalda Batista da Costa, Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Alexandra Grandison

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,607,138
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,565
of 34,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,128
of 239,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#164
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.