↓ Skip to main content

Persistent neurocognitive deficits in cognitively impaired survivors of sepsis are explained by reductions in working memory capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent neurocognitive deficits in cognitively impaired survivors of sepsis are explained by reductions in working memory capacity
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1321145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabian Kattlun, Elizabeth Hertel, Christian Geis, André Scherag, Jonathan Wickel, Kathrin Finke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,766,661
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#27,342
of 34,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,386
of 148,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#192
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.