You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the evocative qualities of masks’ visual imagery and their associations with adversity and trauma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1337927 |
| Authors |
Asli Arslanbek, Bani Malhotra, Kristyn S. Stickley, Joanna Herres, Heather Spooner, Damon G. Lamb, Charles E. Levy, John B. Williamson, Girija Kaimal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#205,859
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#439
of 35,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,721
of 209,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#1
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.