↓ Skip to main content

Maladaptive coping styles moderate the relationship between information on cancer treatment and psychosocial symptoms: an Italian multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maladaptive coping styles moderate the relationship between information on cancer treatment and psychosocial symptoms: an Italian multicenter study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338193
Authors

L. Zerbinati, F. Folesani, R. Caruso, M. Belvederi Murri, M.G. Nanni, S. Righetti, L. Chiefari, A. Muscettola, T. Toffanin, A. Costantini, B. Zaccagnino, F. Ruffilli, L. Grassi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#20,593,934
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,096
of 35,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,302
of 155,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#127
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.