↓ Skip to main content

Infants show systematic rhythmic motor responses while listening to rhythmic speech

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infants show systematic rhythmic motor responses while listening to rhythmic speech
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370007
Authors

Natalie Boll-Avetisyan, Arina Shandala, Alan Langus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,325,751
of 26,230,991 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,480
of 35,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,620
of 194,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#59
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,230,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.