↓ Skip to main content

Decision making in human resource management: a systematic review of the applications of analytic hierarchy process

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision making in human resource management: a systematic review of the applications of analytic hierarchy process
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1400772
Authors

Reza Salehzadeh, Mehran Ziaeian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,766,264
of 26,454,856 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#28,536
of 35,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,252
of 133,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#156
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,454,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.