↓ Skip to main content

All animals are conscious in their own way: comparing the markers hypothesis with the universal consciousness hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
All animals are conscious in their own way: comparing the markers hypothesis with the universal consciousness hypothesis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelica Kaufmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,727,167
of 26,002,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,488
of 34,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,077
of 202,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#37
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,002,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.