The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Filling the gap: brief neuropsychological assessment protocol for glioma patients undergoing awake surgeries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliana Bastos Ohy, Cleiton Formentin, Daniel Andrade Gripp, Joab Alves Nicácio, Maíra Cristina Velho, Larissa Núbia Vilany, Gabriel Frizon Greggianin, Beatriz Sartori, Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos, Silvia Mazzali Verst, Marcos Vinicius Calfat Maldaun |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,499,270
of 26,453,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,812
of 35,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,438
of 143,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#66
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,453,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.