↓ Skip to main content

Is the tea or teacup good? The effect of visual and haptic sensory processing of teacups on the perception of tea flavor

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the tea or teacup good? The effect of visual and haptic sensory processing of teacups on the perception of tea flavor
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su-Chiu Yang, Li-Chieh Hsu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,313,993
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,582
of 35,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,861
of 156,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#72
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.