↓ Skip to main content

Neurobiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
541 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurobiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liciane Fernandes Medeiros, Izabel Cristina Custodio de Souza, Liliane Pinto Vidor, Andressa de Souza, Alícia Deitos, Magdalena Sarah Volz, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo, Iraci L. S. Torres

Abstract

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that is affordable and easy to operate compared to other neuromodulation techniques. Anodal stimulation increases cortical excitability, while the cathodal stimulation decreases it. Although tDCS is a promising treatment approach for chronic pain as well as for neuropsychiatric diseases and other neurological disorders, several complex neurobiological mechanisms that are not well understood are involved in its effect. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of tDCS. The initial search resulted in 171 articles. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we screened 32 full-text articles to extract findings about the neurobiology of tDCS effects including investigation of cortical excitability parameters. Overall, these findings show that tDCS involves a cascade of events at the cellular and molecular levels. Moreover, tDCS is associated with glutamatergic, GABAergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic, and cholinergic activity modulation. Though these studies provide important advancements toward the understanding of mechanisms underlying tDCS effects, further studies are needed to integrate these mechanisms as to optimize clinical development of tDCS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 512 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 93 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 15%
Student > Master 74 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Other 112 21%
Unknown 88 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 110 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 102 19%
Psychology 96 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 7%
Engineering 24 4%
Other 55 10%
Unknown 117 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,961,098
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,264
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,088
of 256,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#29
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.