↓ Skip to main content

Involuntary Autobiographical Memory Chains: Implications for Autobiographical Memory Organization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Involuntary Autobiographical Memory Chains: Implications for Autobiographical Memory Organization
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00183
Pubmed ID
Authors

John H. Mace

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,642,753
of 24,801,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#969
of 12,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,244
of 365,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,801,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.