The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Thinking Back about a Positive Event: The Impact of Processing Style on Positive Affect
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabine Nelis, Emily A. Holmes, Rosa Palmieri, Guglielmo Bellelli, Filip Raes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Belgium | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 67 | 66% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,010,693
of 23,660,680 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,084
of 10,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,119
of 259,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#28
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,660,680 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.