↓ Skip to main content

Toward a Symptom-Guided Neurostimulation for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a Symptom-Guided Neurostimulation for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Pedroarena-Leal, Diane Ruge

Abstract

Therapy resistance of approximately one-third of patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) requires consideration of alternative therapeutic interventions. This article provides a condensed review of the invasive and non-invasive stimulation techniques that have been applied, to date, for treatment and investigation of GTS. Through this perspective and short review, the article discusses potential novel applications for neurostimulation techniques based on a symptom-guided approach. The concept of considering the physiological basis of specific symptoms when using stimulation techniques will provide a platform for more effective non-pharmacological neuromodulation of symptoms in GTS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Neuroscience 7 28%
Psychology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#17,875,029
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,160
of 10,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,863
of 312,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#50
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.