↓ Skip to main content

Possible Facilitative Effects of Repeated Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functional Outcome 1 Month Later in Schizophrenia: An Open Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possible Facilitative Effects of Repeated Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functional Outcome 1 Month Later in Schizophrenia: An Open Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zui Narita, Takuma Inagawa, Kazuki Sueyoshi, Crystal Lin, Tomiki Sumiyoshi

Abstract

Recent research on neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), for the treatment of schizophrenia has mainly focused on psychotic symptoms. We aimed to determine whether repetitive tDCS is efficacious in improving determinants of outcome, such as cognitive function, daily living skills, and depressive mood in patients with schizophrenia. Twenty-eight patients underwent tDCS (2 mA × 20 min) two times per day for 5 consecutive days. The anodal electrode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while the cathodal electrode was placed over the right supraorbital region. One month after the last stimulation, there was a significant improvement on cognitive function, measured by the brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia (d = 0.49). Significant effects were also shown on daily living skills (functional capacity), measured by the UCSD performance-based skills assessment-brief (d = 0.70). Depressive symptoms, measured by the Calgary depression rating scale, as well as psychotic symptoms measured by on the positive and negative syndrome scale positive and general psychopathology subscales also responded to the treatment (d = 0.38, d = 0.48, and d = 0.50, respectively). This is the first study to suggest that tDCS with the anodal electrode on the left prefrontal cortex improves functional capacity and depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. These results may add to the concept that tDCS provides a strategy to enhance functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000018556, UMIN000015953.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#12,760,106
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,431
of 10,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,567
of 321,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#39
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.