The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anxiety and Depression in Drug-Dependent Patients with Cluster C Personality Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Roncero, Adelia de Miguel, Ascensión Fumero, Alfonso C. Abad, Rita Martín, Juan Manuel Bethencourt, Lara Grau-López, Laia Rodríguez-Cintas, Constanza Daigre |
| Abstract |
Comorbidity between personality disorders (PD) and substance-use disorders (SUD) is one of the most common findings in the psychiatric field. The patients with Cluster C disorders present maladjustment traits often characterized by high levels of anxiety. The main aim of this study was to find evidences about higher anxiety and depression prevalence on Cluster C than others Clusters, analyzing similarities and differences within, with other Cluster A and B PD patients and patients without PD. A total of 822 substance dependent patients (ages18-78; Mean = 38.35, SD = 10.14) completed the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders, Beck Depression Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results supported poly-consumption in Cluster C patients, being greater alcohol consumption as well as abuse of both stimulants and depressants. Anxiety and depression did not show just one pattern for all patients with SUD-Cluster C PD. There was a relation between anxiety and depression for all the groups except for the Dependent-PD. Interventions should focus on aspects like depression and anxiety more than on the substance consumed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,755,290
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,545
of 10,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,364
of 442,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#69
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.