The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Perspective on Passive Audio Vocal Measurement in the Evaluation of Selective Mutism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Y. Xu, Jacob Stroud, Renee K. Jozanovic, Jon Clucas, Jake Jungwoo Son, Bonhwang Koo, Juliet Schwarz, Arno Klein, Rachel Busman, Michael P. Milham |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,770,375
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#956
of 10,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,575
of 341,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#21
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.