↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric Evaluation of the Nine-Item Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIUQ-9) in Nine European Samples of Internet Users

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric Evaluation of the Nine-Item Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIUQ-9) in Nine European Samples of Internet Users
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphanie Laconi, Róbert Urbán, Katarzyna Kaliszewska-Czeremska, Daria J. Kuss, Augusto Gnisci, Ida Sergi, Antonia Barke, Franziska Jeromin, Jarosław Groth, Manuel Gamez-Guadix, Neslihan Keser Ozcan, Konstantinos Siomos, Georgios D. Floros, Mark D. Griffiths, Zsolt Demetrovics, Orsolya Király

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 36 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,994,190
of 24,359,979 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,274
of 11,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,558
of 355,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#109
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,359,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.