The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotypes in Gambling Disorder Using Sociodemographic and Clinical Clustering Analysis: An Unidentified New Subtype?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Roser Granero, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Randy Stinchfield, Joel Tremblay, Trevor Steward, Gemma Mestre-Bach, María Lozano-Madrid, Teresa Mena-Moreno, Núria Mallorquí-Bagué, José C. Perales, Juan F. Navas, Carles Soriano-Mas, Neus Aymamí, Mónica Gómez-Peña, Zaida Agüera, Amparo del Pino-Gutiérrez, Virginia Martín-Romera, José M. Menchón |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#706,444
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#396
of 12,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,368
of 357,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#17
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.