↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationship Between the Acceptability of an Internet-Based Intervention for Depression in Primary Care and Clinical Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the Relationship Between the Acceptability of an Internet-Based Intervention for Depression in Primary Care and Clinical Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Mira, Carla Soler, Marta Alda, Rosa Baños, Diana Castilla, Adoración Castro, Javier García-Campayo, Azucena García-Palacios, Margalida Gili, Mariena Hurtado, Fermín Mayoral, Jesús Montero-Marín, Crisitina Botella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 33 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Computer Science 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,571,060
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,905
of 10,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,998
of 350,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#155
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.