The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneity in Disordered Gambling: Decision-Making and Impulsivity in Gamblers Grouped by Preferred Form
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steve Sharman, Luke Clark, Amanda Roberts, Rosanna Michalczuk, Rachel Cocks, Henrietta Bowden-Jones |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,074,477
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,257
of 12,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,177
of 354,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#39
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.