↓ Skip to main content

Postdecision Evidence Integration and Depressive Symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postdecision Evidence Integration and Depressive Symptoms
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeleine E. Moses-Payne, Max Rollwage, Stephen M. Fleming, Jonathan P. Roiser

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 29%
Neuroscience 8 16%
Engineering 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,956,549
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,684
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,651
of 350,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#50
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.