The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Placebo Manipulations Reverse Pain Potentiation by Unpleasant Affective Stimuli
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00663 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philipp Reicherts, Paul Pauli, Camilla Mösler, Matthias J. Wieser |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 47% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,631,014
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,375
of 12,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,751
of 357,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#118
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.