The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Default Mode Network Efficiency Is Correlated With Deficits in Inhibition in Adolescents With Inhalant Use Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dailett M. Hernández-Álvarez, Lucero Pacheco, Roberto Velasco-Segura, Miguel Pérez de la Mora, Claudia Tejeda-Romero, Nadia González-García |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,754,527
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,066
of 13,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,311
of 397,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#222
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.