The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not the Root of the Problem—Hair Cortisol and Cortisone Do Not Mediate the Effect of Child Maltreatment on Body Mass Index
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina Pittner, Renate S. M. Buisman, Lisa J. M. van den Berg, Laura H. C. G. Compier-de Block, Marieke S. Tollenaar, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Bernet M. Elzinga, Lenneke R. A. Alink |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,060,441
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,294
of 10,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,163
of 382,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#245
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.