↓ Skip to main content

Novel Psychoactive Substances in Custodial Settings: A Mixed Method Investigation on the Experiences of People in Prison and Professionals Working With Them

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Psychoactive Substances in Custodial Settings: A Mixed Method Investigation on the Experiences of People in Prison and Professionals Working With Them
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ornella Corazza, Sara Coloccini, Shanna Marrinan, Mike Vigar, Caryl Watkins, Cosimo Zene, Attilio Negri, Andreas Aresti, Sacha Darke, Raffaella Rinaldi, Antonio Metastasio, Giuseppe Bersani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 32 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 36 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,618,805
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,693
of 13,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,403
of 434,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#101
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.