↓ Skip to main content

Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Issues, Opportunities, and Threats

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Issues, Opportunities, and Threats
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Stanghellini, Federico Leoni

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Computer Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,444,034
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,928
of 10,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,253
of 395,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#168
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.