The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Altered Effective Connectivity in Schizophrenic Patients With Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: A Resting-State fMRI Study With Granger Causality Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00575 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Gao, Dongsheng Zhang, Lei Wang, Wei Wang, Yajuan Fan, Min Tang, Xin Zhang, Xiaoyan Lei, Yarong Wang, Jian Yang, Xiaoling Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,956,847
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,130
of 10,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,074
of 400,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#218
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.