↓ Skip to main content

Why Do We Need Computational Models of Psychological Change and Recovery, and How Should They Be Designed and Tested?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Do We Need Computational Models of Psychological Change and Recovery, and How Should They Be Designed and Tested?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Warren Mansell, Vyv Huddy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 27%
Computer Science 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 44 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,317,947
of 26,413,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,440
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,788
of 436,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#48
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,413,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.