↓ Skip to main content

Learning From Artemisia’s Lucretia: Embodied Suffering and Interoception in Suicide

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning From Artemisia’s Lucretia: Embodied Suffering and Interoception in Suicide
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00758
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Courtet, Sébastien Guillaume

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,231,577
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,681
of 10,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,951
of 398,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#107
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.