You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence of Slow Neural Processing, Developmental Differences and Sensitivity to Cannabis Effects in a Sample at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis From the NAPLS Consortium Assessed With the Human Startle Paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00833 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin S. Cadenhead, Erica Duncan, Jean Addington, Carrie Bearden, Tyrone D. Cannon, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Dan Mathalon, Thomas H. McGlashan, Diana O. Perkins, Larry J. Seidman, Ming Tsuang, Elaine F. Walker, Scott W. Woods, Peter Bauchman, Ayse Belger, Ricardo E. Carrión, Franc Donkers, Jason Johannesen, Gregory Light, Margaret Niznikiewicz, Jason Nunag, Brian Roach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,495,922
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,846
of 10,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,404
of 398,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#199
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.