You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shedding Light on “the Hole”: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Adverse Psychological Effects and Mortality Following Solitary Confinement in Correctional Settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00840 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mimosa Luigi, Laura Dellazizzo, Charles-Édouard Giguère, Marie-Hélène Goulet, Alexandre Dumais |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 41% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#500,724
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#299
of 12,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,115
of 427,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#13
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.