The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Specificity and Durability of Changes in Auditory Processing Efficiency After Targeted Cognitive Training in Individuals With Recent-Onset Psychosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00857 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruno Biagianti, Melissa Fisher, Rachel Loewy, Benjamin Brandrett, Catalina Ordorica, Kristin LaCross, Brandon Schermitzler, Michelle McDonald, Ian Ramsay, Sophia Vinogradov |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 8 | 24% |
Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,563,827
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,358
of 10,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,922
of 398,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#136
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.