The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Basic Symptoms Are Associated With Age in Patients With a Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis: Results From the PRONIA Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.552175 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helene Walger, Linda A. Antonucci, Alessandro Pigoni, Rachel Upthegrove, Raimo K. R. Salokangas, Rebekka Lencer, Katharine Chisholm, Anita Riecher-Rössler, Theresa Haidl, Eva Meisenzahl, Marlene Rosen, Stephan Ruhrmann, Joseph Kambeitz, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Peter Falkai, Anne Ruef, Jarmo Hietala, Christos Pantelis, Stephen J. Wood, Paolo Brambilla, Alessandro Bertolino, Stefan Borgwardt, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Frauke Schultze-Lutter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 20% |
Psychology | 7 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,471,640
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,040
of 12,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,454
of 520,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#147
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.