↓ Skip to main content

Adverse Events in Italian Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A National Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Adverse Events in Italian Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A National Survey
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.578465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavia L. Lombardo, Emanuela Salvi, Eleonora Lacorte, Paola Piscopo, Flavia Mayer, Antonio Ancidoni, Giulia Remoli, Guido Bellomo, Gilda Losito, Fortunato D’Ancona, Marco Canevelli, Graziano Onder, Nicola Vanacore, The Italian National Institute of Health Nursing Home Study Group, Antonio Ancidoni, Ilaria Bacigalupo, Guido Bellomo, Luigi Bertinato, Marco Canevelli, Patrizia Carbonari, Maria Grazia Carella, Annamaria Confaloni, Alessio Crestini, Fortunato D’Ancona, Carla Faralli, Simone Fiaccavento, Silvia Francisci, Flavia L. Lombardo, Eleonora Lacorte, Cinzia Lo Noce, Paola Luzi, Tania Lopez, Flavia Mayer, Maria Masocco, Monica Mazzola, Graziano Onder, Ilaria Palazzesi, Luana Penna, Daniela Pierannunzio, Paola Piscopo, Maria Cristina Porrello, Giulia Remoli, Emanuela Salvi, Giulia Scaravelli, Andrea Siddu, Sabrina Sipone, Lucia Speziale, Andrea Tavilla, Nicola Vanacore, Mauro Palma, Gilda Losito, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Daniela Accorgi, Catia Bedosti, Gabriella Carraro, Maria Mongardi, Gianluca Ferrari

Abstract

Older people living in nursing homes (NHs) are particularly vulnerable in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, due to the high prevalence of chronic diseases and disabilities (e.g., dementia). The phenomenon of adverse events (AEs), intended as any harm or injury resulting from medical care or to the failure to provide care, has not yet been investigated in NHs during the pandemic. We performed a national survey on 3,292 NHs, either public or providing services both privately and within the national health system, out of the 3,417 NHs covering the whole Italian territory. An online questionnaire was addressed to the directors of each facility between March 24 and April 27, 2020. The list of NHs was provided by the Dementia Observatory, an online map of Italian services for people with dementia, which was one of the objectives of the implementation of the Italian National Dementia Plan. About 26% of residents in the Italian NHs for older people listed within the Dementia Observatory site had dementia. The objective of our study was to report the frequency of AEs that occurred during the months when SARS-CoV-2 spreading rate was at its highest in the Italian NHs and to identify which conditions and attributes were most associated with the occurrence of AEs by means of multivariate regression logistic analysis. Data are referred to 1,356 NHs that participated in the survey. The overall response rate was 41.2% over a time-period of six weeks (from March 24 to May 5). About one third of the facilities (444 out of 1,334) (33.3%) reported at least 1 adverse event, with a total of 2,000 events. Among the included NHs, having a bed capacity higher than the median of 60 beds (OR=1.57, CI95% 1.17-2.09; p=0.002), an observed increased in the use of psychiatric drugs (OR=1.80, CI95% 1.05-3.07; p=0.032), adopting physical restraint measures (OR=1.97, CI95% 1.47-2.64; p<0.001), residents hospitalized due to flu-like symptoms (OR =1.73, CI95% 1.28-2.32; p<0.001), and being located in specific geographic areas (OR=3.59, CI95% 1.81-7.08; OR = 2.90, CI95% 1.45-5.81 and OR = 4.02, CI05% 2.01-8.04 for, respectively, North-West, North-East and Centre vs South, p<0.001) were all factors positively associated to the occurrence of adverse events in the facility. Future recommendations for the management and care of residents in NHs during the COVID-19 pandemic should include specific statements for the most vulnerable populations, such as people with dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 42 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,038,137
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,564
of 9,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,157
of 409,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#115
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.