The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Continued Improvement After Automated Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Spider Phobia Explained by Subsequent in-vivo Exposure? A First Test of the Lowered Threshold Hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645273 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Lindner, Peter Dafgård, Alexander Miloff, Gerhard Andersson, Lena Reuterskiöld, William Hamilton, Per Carlbring |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,344
of 10,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,717
of 445,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#360
of 621 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 621 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.