The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the Clinical Impact of National Dementia Behaviour Support Programs on Neuropsychiatric Outcomes in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.652254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Macfarlane, Mustafa Atee, Thomas Morris, Daniel Whiting, Madeleine Healy, Marie Alford, Colm Cunningham |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,124,836
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#582
of 10,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,734
of 436,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#32
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.