↓ Skip to main content

Study Protocol: Longitudinal Attention and Temperament Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study Protocol: Longitudinal Attention and Temperament Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656958
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koraly Pérez-Edgar, Vanessa LoBue, Kristin A. Buss, Andy P. Field, The LAnTs Team, Lori Reider, Jessica Burris, Denise Oleas, Anna Zhou, Centia Thomas, Samantha Leigh, Brendan Ostlund, Berenice Anaya, Kelley Gunther, Alicia Vallorani, Elizabeth Youatt, Caitlin Smith, Norbert Promagan, Kayla Brown, Laura Bierstedt, Claudia Pinzon, Kali Revilla, Michell Sarquez, Piumi Rajasekera, Elveena Fareedi, Annika Kershner, Meghan McDoniel, Xiaoxue Fu, Santiago Morales, Leigha MacNeill, Eran Auday, Briana Ermanni, Dara Tucker, Kelly Metcalf

Abstract

Background: Attention processes may play a central role in shaping trajectories of socioemotional development. Individuals who are clinically anxious or have high levels of trait anxiety sometimes show attention biases to threat. There is emerging evidence that young children also demonstrate a link between attention bias to salient stimuli and broad socioemotional profiles. However, we do not have a systematic and comprehensive assessment of how attention biases, and associated neural and behavioral correlates, emerge and change from infancy through toddlerhood. This paper describes the Longitudinal Attention and Temperament study (LAnTs), which is designed to target these open questions. Method: The current study examines core components of attention across the first 2 years of life, as well as measures of temperament, parental psychosocial functioning, and biological markers of emotion regulation and anxiety risk. The demographically diverse sample (N = 357) was recruited from the area surrounding State College, PA, Harrisburg, PA, and Newark, NJ. Infants and parents are assessed at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months. Assessments include repeated measures of attention bias (via eye-tracking) in both infants and parents, and measures of temperament (reactivity, negative affect), parental traits (e.g., anxiety and depression), biological markers (electrophysiology, EEG, and respiratory sinus arrythmia, RSA), and the environment (geocoding, neighborhood characteristics, perceived stress). Outcomes include temperamental behavioral inhibition, social behavior, early symptom profiles, and cellular aging (e.g., telomere length). Discussion: This multi-method study aims to identify biomarkers and behavioral indicators of attentional and socioemotional trajectories. The current study brought together innovative measurement techniques to capture the earliest mechanisms that may be causally linked to a pervasive set of problem behaviors. The analyses the emerge from the study will address important questions of socioemotional development and help shape future research. Analyses systematically assessing attention bias patterns, as well as socioemotional profiles, will allow us to delineate the time course of any emerging interrelations. Finally, this study is the first to directly assess competing models of the role attention may play in socioemotional development in the first years of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 24 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,798,253
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,572
of 10,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,111
of 448,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#149
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.