↓ Skip to main content

Digital Interventions for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital Interventions for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.726222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Saramago, Lina Gega, David Marshall, Georgios F. Nikolaidis, Dina Jankovic, Hollie Melton, Sarah Dawson, Rachel Churchill, Laura Bojke

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Psychology 4 11%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,211,160
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,729
of 10,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,104
of 509,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#88
of 741 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 741 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.