You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Habenula: Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Trial Registries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jürgen Germann, Manuel Mameli, Gavin J. B. Elias, Aaron Loh, Alaa Taha, Flavia Venetucci Gouveia, Alexandre Boutet, Andres M. Lozano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,741,891
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,639
of 12,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,966
of 440,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#132
of 637 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 637 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.