The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predictive Role of Executive Function in the Efficacy of Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Modalities for Treating Methamphetamine Use Disorder—A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.774192 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Li-Jin Wang, Lin-Lin Mu, Zi-Xuan Ren, Hua-Jun Tang, Ya-Dong Wei, Wen-Juan Wang, Pei-Pei Song, Lin Zhu, Qiang Ling, He Gao, Lei Zhang, Xun Song, Hua-Feng Wei, Lei-Xin Chang, Tao Wei, Yu-Jing Wang, Wei Zhao, Yan Wang, Lu-Ying Liu, Yi-Ding Zhou, Rui-Dong Zhou, Hua-Shan Xu, Dong-Liang Jiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,293,467
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,460
of 10,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,794
of 513,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#377
of 738 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 738 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.