↓ Skip to main content

Differences between users’ and addiction medicine experts’ harm and benefit assessments of licit and illicit psychoactive drugs: Input for psychoeducation and legalization/restriction debates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences between users’ and addiction medicine experts’ harm and benefit assessments of licit and illicit psychoactive drugs: Input for psychoeducation and legalization/restriction debates
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1041762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Udo Bonnet, Michael Specka, Ann-Kristin Kanti, Norbert Scherbaum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 12 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#19,158,216
of 23,740,970 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,383
of 10,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,196
of 406,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#367
of 660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,740,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.