↓ Skip to main content

The Danish High-Risk and Resilience Study—VIA 15 – A Study Protocol for the Third Clinical Assessment of a Cohort of 522 Children Born to Parents Diagnosed With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder and…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Danish High-Risk and Resilience Study—VIA 15 – A Study Protocol for the Third Clinical Assessment of a Cohort of 522 Children Born to Parents Diagnosed With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder and Population-Based Controls
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.809807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup, Nicoline Hemager, Vibeke Fuglsang Bliksted, Aja Neergaard Greve, Jessica Ohland, Martin Wilms, Sinnika Birkehøj Rohd, Merete Birk, Anette Faurskov Bundgaard, Andreas Færgemand Laursen, Oskar Hougaard Jefsen, Nanna Lawaetz Steffensen, Anna Krogh Andreassen, Lotte Veddum, Christina Bruun Knudsen, Mette Enevoldsen, Marie Nymand, Julie Marie Brandt, Anne Søndergaard, Line Carmichael, Maja Gregersen, Mette Falkenberg Krantz, Birgitte Klee Burton, Martin Dietz, Ron Nudel, Line Korsgaard Johnsen, Kit Melissa Larsen, David Meder, Oliver James Hulme, William Frans Christiaan Baaré, Kathrine Skak Madsen, Torben Ellegaard Lund, Leif Østergaard, Anders Juul, Troels Wesenberg Kjær, Carsten Hjorthøj, Hartwig Roman Siebner, Ole Mors, Merete Nordentoft

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 46 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 47 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,338,702
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,223
of 10,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,812
of 442,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#192
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.