↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Comorbid Chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Open-Label Single-Arm Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Comorbid Chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Open-Label Single-Arm Pilot Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.865466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maud Rothärmel, Cherifa Benosman, Wissam El-Hage, Caroline Berjamin, Diane Ribayrol, Olivier Guillin, Raphaël Gaillard, Lucie Berkovitch, Virginie Moulier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 15 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,331,350
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,210
of 10,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,621
of 437,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#137
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.