The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Catatonia: A Review and Case Series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876834 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre Haroche, Nolwenn Giraud, Fabien Vinckier, Ali Amad, Jonathan Rogers, Mylène Moyal, Laetitia Canivet, Lucie Berkovitch, Raphaël Gaillard, David Attali, Marion Plaze |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,623,681
of 23,607,611 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,284
of 10,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,967
of 444,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#114
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,607,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.