↓ Skip to main content

Biobanking in everyday clinical practice in psychiatry—The Munich Mental Health Biobank

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biobanking in everyday clinical practice in psychiatry—The Munich Mental Health Biobank
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.934640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janos L. Kalman, Gerrit Burkhardt, Kristina Adorjan, Barbara B. Barton, Sylvia De Jonge, Daniela Eser-Valeri, Christine M. Falter-Wagner, Urs Heilbronner, Andrea Jobst, Daniel Keeser, Christian Koenig, Gabi Koller, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Carolin Kurz, Dominic Landgraf, Katharina Merz, Richard Musil, Afton M. Nelson, Frank Padberg, Sergi Papiol, Oliver Pogarell, Robert Perneczky, Florian Raabe, Matthias A. Reinhard, Almut Richter, Tobias Rüther, Maria Susanne Simon, Andrea Schmitt, Lenka Slapakova, Nanja Scheel, Cornelius Schüle, Elias Wagner, Sven P. Wichert, Peter Zill, Peter Falkai, Thomas G. Schulze, Eva Christina Schulte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 16 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 16 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,466,103
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,333
of 10,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,839
of 433,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#82
of 796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.