The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of clinical and neurocognitive factors in psychosocial functioning after a first episode non-affective psychosis: differences between males and females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.982583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Serra-Navarro, Silvia Amoretti, Norma Verdolini, María Florencia Forte, Ana M. Sánchez-Torres, Eduard Vieta, Derek Clougher, Antonio Lobo, Ana González-Pinto, Rocío Panadero, Alexandra Roldán, André F. Carvalho, Elena de la Serna, Alba Toll, J. A. Ramos-Quiroga, Carla Torrent, Manuel J. Cuesta, Miguel Bernardo, PEPs Group, Jairo González-Díaz, Lucila Barbosa, Covadonga M. Diaz-Caneja, Marta Rapado-Castro, Carlo Alemany, Aina Avila-Parcet, Iñaki Zorrilla, Itxasco Gonzalez-Ortega, Concepción De-la-Cámara, Pedro Saz, Juan Nacher, Esther Lorente, Teresa Legido, Francesc Casanovas, Nestor Arbelo, Lidia Ilzarbe, Josefina Castro-Fornieles, Immaculada Baeza, Fernando Contreras, Teresa Bobes Bascarán, Leticia González-Blanco, Rafael Segarra Echevarría, Arantzazu Zabala Rabadán, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, Luis Sanchez-Pastor, Judith Usall, Anna Butjosa, Salvador Sarró, María Ángeles García León, Ángela Ibáñez, Lucía Moreno-Izco, Vicent Balanzá-Martinez |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,287,231
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,223
of 12,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,632
of 441,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#170
of 768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.