↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xian-Jun Lan, Xin-Hu Yang, Zhen-Juan Qin, Dong-Bin Cai, Qi-Man Liu, Jian-Xin Mai, Can-jin Deng, Xing-Bing Huang, Wei Zheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 15 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Psychology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 17 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,768,949
of 24,294,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,725
of 11,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,282
of 228,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#174
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.