The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case conceptualization in child welfare: an underused resource to improve child, family, and provider outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1292690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill R. McTavish, Angela McHolm, Anne Niec, Anna Marie Pietrantonio, Christine McKee, Harriet L. MacMillan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,244,533
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,385
of 13,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,115
of 378,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#182
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.