↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1325399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Rodolico, Pierfelice Cutrufelli, Antonio Di Francesco, Andrea Aguglia, Gaetano Catania, Carmen Concerto, Alessandro Cuomo, Andrea Fagiolini, Giuseppe Lanza, Ludovico Mineo, Antimo Natale, Laura Rapisarda, Antonino Petralia, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Eugenio Aguglia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Unspecified 3 14%
Psychology 2 9%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,462,742
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,322
of 12,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,667
of 308,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#89
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.